Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Mahmud saidiy ¹
• hasan asgharpour ²

¹ University of Shahed

² Faculty Member of Shahed University

Abstract

The most important issue of theoretical mysticism is "divine names" whose manifestations begin from the position of oneness and oneness. In this way, the two mentioned positions are very important in theoretical mysticism. The only document narrated by mystics in explaining these two positions is "Hadith Amma". Some mystics consider "Amma" to be compatible with oneness, while others apply it to the status of oneness. Although it seems that this difference is not very fundamental due to the closeness of the two mentioned authorities, but the hadith cited by them is subject to serious criticism from the point of view of source, intermediary and document; Because it has not been reported in any of the ancient sources of Shia narration, its content is inconsistent with the fundamental beliefs and theological foundations of Muslims (especially Shia and Ash'arite), and there are unknown and unreliable narrators in its chain of documents. On the other hand, there are many authentic narrations reported in ancient sources of Shia narrations that conflict with the aforementioned hadith. According to the rules of hadith jurisprudence and hadith criticism, "Uma's Hadith" is not capable of dealing with conflicting traditions due to the weaknesses of sources, brokers, and documents, so its reference in explaining and proving the status of unity and unity is not compatible with the scientific and epistemological foundations of Islam.